Anomaly Replication Lab
  • The zoo
  • Screener
  • Multiple testing
  • Correlations
  • Composite
  • Methodology
  • Guides
  • Resources
Sign in
Anomaly Replication LabSign in
  • The zoo
  • Screener
  • Multiple testing
  • Correlations
  • Composite
  • Methodology
  • Guides
  • Resources

Educational replication, not advice. Long-short returns are decile spreads or published factor series from the Kenneth R. French Data Library and AQR, value-weighted, US equities, and gross of transaction and shorting costs — which for high-turnover signals like short-term reversal is the whole story. Reproducing a premium in-sample is not evidence it will persist. Past performance does not predict future results.

© 2026 Austin Levenberg. All rights reserved. This site’s code, design, written analysis, and computed results are not licensed for reuse or redistribution — terms of use · privacy.

Data: Kenneth R. French Data Library, AQR Capital Management public data sets.

Part of austinlev.dev — four research tools, and a note on where this is headed.

← the zoo
Low riskHolds up

Betting-against-beta (AQR factor)

The formal long-low-beta / short-high-beta factor, leverage-adjusted to be beta-neutral.

Frazzini & Pedersen · Journal of Financial Economics · published 2014 · original sample 1926–2012 (reported ≈ +8.5%/yr, t ≈ 4.9)

Our replication
+7.4%
1930–2026, per year
Full-sample t
5.7
Sharpe 0.70
Post-publication
+4.2%
since 2015, t = 1.8
Decay
49%
of the premium is gone

The whole history

Growth of $1 in the long-short strategy, gross of trading and shorting costs. The dashed line marks the year the paper was published — everything to its right is out-of-sample.

$1 in the long-short strategy, gross of costs. Grey = the sample the paper had; blue = everything since.

Before and after publication

The comparison the site is built around.

WindowReturn/yrVolSharpet-statMax DD
Paper's sample (1926–2012)+7.7%11.5%0.715.2-55%
After publication (2015–2026)+3.8%9.2%0.451.8-15%
Full sample (1930–2026)+7.4%11.1%0.705.7-55%

Against the factor models

Is there a risk-adjusted alpha left once you control for the standard factors? Alpha is annualized; t-stats use Newey–West standard errors.

ModelAlpha/yrAlpha tR²Biggest loadings
CAPM (market only)+9.5%4.90.01Mkt-RF -0.07
Fama–French 3-factor+7.9%4.60.10HML +0.34, Mkt-RF -0.02, SMB -0.00
Fama–French 5-factor+5.2%3.20.22RMW +0.49, CMA +0.41, HML +0.13
FF5 + momentum+3.6%2.20.27RMW +0.48, CMA +0.36, HML +0.21

Rolling performance

Trailing 3-year Sharpe ratio. Long stretches below zero are common.

By decade

1930s+5.0%/yrSharpe 0.29
1940s+4.2%/yrSharpe 0.52
1950s+5.0%/yrSharpe 0.81
1960s+7.3%/yrSharpe 1.08
1970s+7.8%/yrSharpe 0.98
1980s+16.4%/yrSharpe 1.61
1990s+7.4%/yrSharpe 0.63
2000s+11.6%/yrSharpe 0.63
2010s+9.5%/yrSharpe 1.55
2020s+1.6%/yrSharpe 0.15

The risk explanation

Explicitly a leverage-constraint premium, not a risk premium — see low beta above.

The behavioral explanation

Lottery demand for high-beta names.

Why it might have decayed

The construction leverages up the low-beta leg, which assumes you can actually borrow at near the risk-free rate. Critics show the returns concentrate in micro-caps and are sensitive to how you lag the beta estimate.

Long-short = AQR's published factor series. Value-weighted, US equities, monthly, gross of transaction and shorting costs. The original-paper figures are approximate and annualized for comparison.